लाहौर से दिल्ली लौटते ही पाकिस्तान मे भूकम्प के झटके। अब राजनीतिक,राजनयिक और आतंकी झटकों का इंतज़ार। ओम माथुरमैने 26 दिसम्बर को ये छोटी सी पोस्ट फेसबुक पर डाली थी। लेकिन आतंकी इम्पेक्ट इतनी जल्दी होगा, इसकी उम्मीद नहीं थी। पीएम मोदी खुद आगे होकर पाकिस्तान गए थे और पाक पीएम शरीफ को बर्थडे विश करने के साथ ही उनकी नातिन को शादी की बधाई दी थी। लेकिन इसके बदले क्या मिला। पाकिस्तान बदमाशी से बाज आया क्या। पठानकोट के एयरबेस पर हमला हुआ। हमारे 11 जवान शहीद हो गए। एयरबेस पर हमले का मतलब युद्ध होता है। यानि युद्ध के समय दुश्मन देश ऐसे ठिकानों पर हमला करता है। खुद पीएम यह कह चुके हैं। हमले मे पाकिस्तानी हाथ के कई सबूत मिल गए हैं। क्या अब मोदी अपने उस बयान को वापस सुनेंगे कि पाकिस्तान को उसकी भाषा मे ही जवाब देना चाहिए। पाक बार -बार अपनी आतंकी भाषा बोल रहा है, लेकिन हम क्या कर रहे हैं। उस देश से दोस्ती और शांति की उम्मीद कर रहे हैं, जो चलता ही भारत विरोध पर है । जिस देश की सेना और खुफिया एजेंसी हमारे देश मे आतंकी हमलों की सूत्रधार हो। जहां की सरकार और पीएम सेना के रहमोकरम पर हो। जहां आतंकी खुले आम घूमकर भारत के खिलाफ जहर उगलते हो,उसे सबक सिखाना क्या जरूरी नहीं है। हर आतंकी हमले के बाद सरकार और सत्तारूढ नेता पाक को सबक सिखाने की मौखिक क्रांति करते हैं। विपक्ष सरकार को कोसने की परम्परा निभाता है। लेकिन जान जाती है हमारे वीर जवानों की। आखिर ये सिलसिला कब तक चलेगा। हम तो गले मिलें और वो बार बार पीठ मे छुरा घोंपे, पाक की इस हरकत को कब तक बरदाश्त किया जाएगा। अब साडी, शाँल,आम,बर्थ डे विश से आगे बढकर सख्ती की जरूरत है। ओम माथुर ,अजमेर
1 thought on “मोदी इम्पेक्ट”
My prayers are with the families of the brave soldiers who gave up their life. Important points to consider with a cool mind are –
1. Pakistan is run by three systems. Govt (prime minister Nawaz Sharif), Army and independent groups (terrorists) that do not hesitate to kill hundreds of Pakistanis even in suicide bombings.
2. Inviting Modi to grand daughter’s marriage Nawaz Sherif may have extended a hand of friendship (Modi will not just walk into a wedding, he may have been invited). if he had done so he took great risk even on his life.
3. Separatists did not like it and they wanted the good relationship between two neighbors not to take place. This attack or similar attack in another form was expected for sure to break these talks.
4. These attacks due to coming close of Modi and Nawaz Sherif were expected. bigger question is WHY WE COULD NOT PREVENT THEM?
4. Breaking the talk gives terrorists victory and modus operandi for future – anytime India and Pakistan try to come closer do something that they can’t come close. A very dangerous precedence for both countries.
5. If India and Pakistan come very close their business (terrorists) shop in Pakistan will close and they cannot get overseas funding in name of say Kashmir or Punjab (in the past it was Punjab).
6. ‘Taking some action’ by past experience means arrest and release after few weeks.
7. Talks should have continued and moved to ‘Pathankot’ to show solidarity to those dead.
8. Why we cannot take care of someone hurting us directly??
9. Why Modi had to take this step – all are asking for blood for blood without giving it a thought and he cannot appear weak.
10. What we need to do – think with a cool head. support Modi (or whoever would have been the prime Minister in such a case), stop disruptive elements from spreading malicious news.
Winners of this episode –
All divisive forces in India and Pakistan
Biggest Losers of this incidence –
1. Families of soldiers that passed away or injured
2. People of Pakistan – With better India ties they would have benefited the most
3. People of India
What do you think? Please comment.
My prayers are with the families of the brave soldiers who gave up their life. Important points to consider with a cool mind are –
1. Pakistan is run by three systems. Govt (prime minister Nawaz Sharif), Army and independent groups (terrorists) that do not hesitate to kill hundreds of Pakistanis even in suicide bombings.
2. Inviting Modi to grand daughter’s marriage Nawaz Sherif may have extended a hand of friendship (Modi will not just walk into a wedding, he may have been invited). if he had done so he took great risk even on his life.
3. Separatists did not like it and they wanted the good relationship between two neighbors not to take place. This attack or similar attack in another form was expected for sure to break these talks.
4. These attacks due to coming close of Modi and Nawaz Sherif were expected. bigger question is WHY WE COULD NOT PREVENT THEM?
4. Breaking the talk gives terrorists victory and modus operandi for future – anytime India and Pakistan try to come closer do something that they can’t come close. A very dangerous precedence for both countries.
5. If India and Pakistan come very close their business (terrorists) shop in Pakistan will close and they cannot get overseas funding in name of say Kashmir or Punjab (in the past it was Punjab).
6. ‘Taking some action’ by past experience means arrest and release after few weeks.
7. Talks should have continued and moved to ‘Pathankot’ to show solidarity to those dead.
8. Why we cannot take care of someone hurting us directly??
9. Why Modi had to take this step – all are asking for blood for blood without giving it a thought and he cannot appear weak.
10. What we need to do – think with a cool head. support Modi (or whoever would have been the prime Minister in such a case), stop disruptive elements from spreading malicious news.
Winners of this episode –
All divisive forces in India and Pakistan
Biggest Losers of this incidence –
1. Families of soldiers that passed away or injured
2. People of Pakistan – With better India ties they would have benefited the most
3. People of India
What do you think? Please comment.